Re: gEDA-dev: gnetlist as one way path?

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>]

>Well, I was shooting for converging in libeda version 3.

	Okay, but keep in mind that I will _not_ accept any huge changeset
(read: a rewrite or drastic/fundamental data structure changes) into
gEDA/gaf unless there is consensus on the design and has been vetted by
the maintainers of the code going forward.

	The alternative is baby change integration with the existing
code base.  That has worked fairly well in the past and continues to
work well today.

	I'm not trying to be difficult here, but I think it is pretty
unreasonable to expect me (or anybody else) to volunteer maintain code
without going through the standard contribution process (small controlled
patch sets with validation/test).  Thanks,

					-Ales

PS. Yes, another option is always on the table: "fork the code base and
simply bypass this stubborn jerk". :)  All I ask is that you don't call
the fork gschem/libgeda/gaf as that code base will continue to exist
and be used.




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev