Re: gEDA-dev: gnetlist as one way path?

[Steve Meier <smeier-at-NOSPAMalchemyresearch_dot_com>]

Ales,

Those of us with drivers lincenses know that converging into traffic
should be done in a way not to cause massive crashes.

Steve Meier

Ales Hvezda wrote:
> [snip]
>   
>> I wasn't seeking too, nor do I have any desire too. By making my changes
>> available I only sought to allow others who are interested in
>> improvements access to my work. Do you wish me to not make my code
>> available? Would you like me to move on and not participate?
>>     
>
> 	Gah!  Okay, so this whole thread has gone to hell.  I'm sorry
> I caused this whole mess.
>
> 	My only point is that suddenly changing a working and stable
> code base to something completely brand new (that is, taking your code
> base and suddenly making mainstream gEDA/gaf) is highly risky and will
> most likely upset existing users (that don't expect the rug to change
> under them so suddenly).  Maybe this was not your intention, but how
> should I have interpreted the following exchange then?
>
> 	>
> 	>
> 	> Sounds very nice. What would it take to get your version of libgeda  
> 	> into the gEDA mainstream?
> 	>
> 	>  	 
> 	Well, I was shooting for converging in libeda version 3.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Ales
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> geda-dev@moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
>
>   



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev