Re: gEDA-dev: Clarity or Sanity?

[John Griessen <john-at-NOSPAMecosensory_dot_com>]

Peter Clifton wrote:
> Dear all,


> Alternatively - you might see this as useful, adding in a gnucap
> directive symbol might set a variable which allows the various helper
> functions to show more simulation specific options.


That seems clear and sane to me.  A symbol as code plugin is one way to describe it.
It's an easy level of plugin creation that might become very popular, even without being in
a favorite language...  Guile isn't that arcane, is it?  Maybe we could have python-calling symbols too.

John Griessen


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev