Re: gEDA-dev: Clarity or Sanity?

[John Griessen <john-at-NOSPAMecosensory_dot_com>]

al davis wrote:

> On Monday 11 June 2007, John Griessen wrote:
>> I like the idea of a separate place for commands to
>> simulators via symbols on the schematic that are probes -- a
>> pictorial symbol of a lab instrument.



> I was thinking of something much simpler 



> Now you want to update the schematic.  If the changes are 
> simple, such as component values, it would be nice an easy way 
> to modify the schematic file to include the changes.  The best 
> way is a stand-alone program, or maybe something like gnetlist 
> working backwards.


Sure.  call a program
gschemlist
gbackschem
gnetbackwards
gbassack...    well....


with a  man page and hook it into
your flow however you like.   Won't break anything or rile anyone.

Maybe there are better names for it :-)

John Griessen


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev