Re: gEDA-dev: Arbitrary Polygon Hatch Series

[Ales Hvezda <ahvezda-at-NOSPAMmoria_dot_seul_dot_org>]

[snip]
> Is there any (good) reason why libgeda's types pretend to work like
> C++ class names, and why we don't just declare variables as "struct
> st_point p1;"?  I've never liked using typedefs for non-opaque types
> (I realise the irony), preferring to use them only as placeholders for
> other atomic types, as with uint8_t and friends.

That is my doing.  I simply preferred "OBJECT* foo" instead of "struct
st_object* foo".  Unless there is a real pressing technical reason,
please do not change this.  Thanks.

-Ales




_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev