Re: gEDA: Icarus Verilog 20010121 Snapshot

[mcmahill-at-NOSPAMmtl_dot_mit_dot_edu]

have you run this on verilog-xl or modelsim lately?  Just curious as to
how Icarus Verilog stacks up there.

-Dan

On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Steve Wilson wrote:

> I've seen chips going to production that didn't have coverage numbers this
> good ;-)
> 
> I guess we'll just have to write more tests!
> 
> Steve Wilson
> 
> mcmahill@mtl.mit.edu wrote:
> 
> > 2 things.  I've attached diffs to the solaris package files for 0.6.
> >
> > as far as the testsuite, its at:
> >
> > Tests passed: 414, Parse Errors: 0, Unsupported: 0, failed execution, 16,
> > crashed: 0, C compiler err: 17 total: 456
> >
> > Tests passed: 414, Parse Errors: 0, Unsupported: 0, failed execution, 16,
> > crashed: 0, C compiler err: 17 total: 456
> >
> > for solaris-sparc and netbsd-alpha.  Hey, 414/456 is 90.8%, not too
> > shabby.
> >
> > -dan
> >
>