[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Subject: Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
From: John Sheahan <jrsheahan-at-NOSPAMoptushome_dot_com_dot_au>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:09:43 +1100
Delivery-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:09:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20050209142121.72F7B2AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
References: <20050209142121.72F7B2AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913)

Stuart Brorson wrote:

>>The solution to library hell is to use packages for your distribution
>>from the distributor or a third party. Debian users can "apt-get install
>>pcb" and get a working installation guaranteed.
> 
> 
> That's fine for Debian, but what about SuSE, Red Hat, AIX, Solaris,
> Slackware, HPuX, Tru64, Mandrake, BSD, and so on?
> 

having discovered the ease of using apt-get on fedora, this argument
has holes in it.

apt is a fedora extra, but yum is in the base package and appears to 
achieve the same thing.  I reckon apt is a valid solution.

john

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
  - From: Stuart Brorson

References:
- Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
  - From: Stuart Brorson

Prev by Date: Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
Next by Date: Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
Prev by thread: Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: Trolltech introduce dual licensing for windows with qt4.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread