[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4

To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Subject: Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
From: Charles Lepple <clepple-at-NOSPAMgmail_dot_com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:51:57 -0400
Delivery-Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:51:52 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=K+ReQLQ/Gun0jYS/aHiKBNmN32RynZnjkIG93VHo2AQeTm2xVwoiJy91PRNqnjCpncMgkx72jcTEXDVN4g/6EjKfqjgnvZPyGC/b0Zx0VH4ja++ON2bGBO+5bJzV8gNhRY+U9oVyZ5TLLDtP207zhOtFeSVSAQnNVy+lU5q0fRQ=
In-Reply-To: <af89664605051408172eabfa62@mail.gmail.com>
References: <af89664605051408172eabfa62@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org
Sender: owner-geda-dev-at-NOSPAMseul_dot_org

On 5/14/05, I wrote:
> djopt.c:280: error: static declaration of 'abs' follows non-static declaration

A patch is in SF.net:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1202534&group_id=73743&atid=538813

Looks like Debian's patch file removes the redefinition entirely
(Debian bug #294319), but the above patch should detect whether or not
abs() is available.

Could someone with pcb CVS access please apply it?

Thanks,

-- 
- Charles Lepple

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
  - From: Hamish Moffatt
- Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
  - From: Greg Lauer

References:
- gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
  - From: Charles Lepple

Prev by Date: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
Next by Date: Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
Prev by thread: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
Next by thread: Re: gEDA: pcb-20050127: build error using OS X 10.4 gcc4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread