Re: gEDA-dev: Re: gEDA: gd instead of libgdeda

[Dan McMahill <dan-at-NOSPAMmcmahill_dot_net>]

Patrick Bernaud wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> Carlos Nieves Ónega writes:
>  > [...]
>  > I got some time to get into this, so I changed libgeda and gschem to use
>  > libgd instead of libgdgeda, and removed any reference to libgdgeda.
>  > 
> 
> There is a problem in the configure script of gschem: the test for
> libgd is too basic and will always result in a false positive of libgd
> availability. 
> 
> The reason: 'gd' is in 'gdk' and gdk is part of libgeda's dependencies
> and therefore appears in LIBGEDA_LIBS. I have no idea on how to
> improve this detection though.

borrow the configure.ac bit from pcb which detects gd.  I think the 
issues from early on are ironed out with it.

-Dan


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev