Re: gEDA-dev: Re: gEDA: gd instead of libgdeda

[Dan McMahill <dan-at-NOSPAMmcmahill_dot_net>]

Dan McMahill wrote:
> Patrick Bernaud wrote:
> 
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> Carlos Nieves Ónega writes:
>>  > [...]
>>  > I got some time to get into this, so I changed libgeda and gschem 
>> to use
>>  > libgd instead of libgdgeda, and removed any reference to libgdgeda.
>>  >
>> There is a problem in the configure script of gschem: the test for
>> libgd is too basic and will always result in a false positive of libgd
>> availability.
>> The reason: 'gd' is in 'gdk' and gdk is part of libgeda's dependencies
>> and therefore appears in LIBGEDA_LIBS. I have no idea on how to
>> improve this detection though.
> 
> 
> borrow the configure.ac bit from pcb which detects gd.  I think the 
> issues from early on are ironed out with it.
> 
> -Dan

ah, a little more looking shows that what I suggested won't quite get 
you there.  I'll fix it.  Hopefully tonight.

-Dan


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev