Re: gEDA-dev: GPL clarification text -- please review & comment/flame!

["C P Tarun" <tcpip-at-NOSPAMdhandanought_dot_org>]

I too read through this thread but I don't remember seeing any reference
to LGPL, except for Steve's post below.

Isn't LGPL a good way for many of us make our symbols/footprints available?
(This assumes that I understand what most of us are feeling about their
symbols/footprints.) Doesn't LGPL provide a good mix of "don't make
proprietary derivatives of my footprints, but you are free to make proprietary
circuits using them"?

Tarun

On 3/17/07, Steve Meier <smeier@alchemyresearch.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Thanks again for all your efforts in developing PCB. I intend to make my
> libraries of foot prints and symbols available in some sort of lgpl way.
>
> Steve Meier


_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev