Re: gEDA-dev: SoC Hopeful

[John Griessen <john-at-NOSPAMecosensory_dot_com>]

Dan McMahill wrote:
> Peter Clifton wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 08:24 +0530, C P Tarun wrote:
>> [snip]

>> You would have one library which is used by all tools (probably in C as
>> this is what the suite mostly uses), then you would provide language
>> bindings so people can write the useful utilities they want.
>>
>> If this means having to split code out of existing tools and into a
>> library, that is the way forward in terms of code reuse.
> 
> I completely agree.
> 
> -Dan
> 

I excerpted this email thread into a listing called  "function library with bindings to users language of choice"
on the wiki.

John Griessen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-dev mailing list
> geda-dev@moria.seul.org
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev



_______________________________________________
geda-dev mailing list
geda-dev@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev